The Void Strategy
: Nothing to Hit, Everything to Lose
Napoleon, the great man, marched his armies across Europe, shattered empires. Thought he had it all figured out. Then he met the Spanish in the mountains, the Cossacks in the snow. They didn't fight him, not properly. They just… disappeared. And it broke him. Not the bullets, not the bayonets. Just the sheer, maddening absence.
Most wars, the ones you read about in history books, they're neat. Orderly. Two armies, two lines, facing off. A grand spectacle of bluster and blood. The big, dumb behemoths smashing into each other, trying for that decisive blow, that quick kill. That's the conventional wisdom.
But what if the target just... isn't there?
We're talking about the Strategy of the Void. Giving your enemies nothing to hit. Being dangerous, but shapeless. Invisible. It's not new, not by a long shot. T.E. Lawrence, the mad bastard, knew it in the desert. Napoleon, that strutting peacock, learned it the hard way in Spain and Russia. He wanted a fight. They gave him… air. And it broke him.
The Art of the Pinprick
Conventional war it’s about contact. It’s about seizing ground, dominating a theatre. It’s about a quick resolution before your resources bleed out and your lads start asking why they’re still humping it through another godforsaken field. But the guerrilla? He doesn't play by those rules. Never has.
You want a battle? I'll give you a ghost.
You want limited space? I'll drag you across an entire continent.
You want a quick end? I'll make time your most brutal enemy.
This ain't about glorious charges. It's about a million annoying little cuts, a thousand sleepless nights, the constant gnawing dread of the unseen enemy. It's about driving a powerful foe insane with frustration. Napoleon, the great strategist, had his mind give out before his army ever did. He wasn't beaten by superior numbers; he was undone by the sheer irritation of it all. The Cossacks, the Spanish. They just kept chipping away, never offering a proper scrap. Just... disappearing.
The Psychology of Nothing
This isn't just for fields of battle. This is life, mate. Think about it. That person who deliberately avoids eye contact, who sidesteps every direct question, who leaves you hanging when you crave a straight answer. You want to grab them, shake them, and force them into a clear engagement. But they don't give you one. They control the dynamic by refusing to play.
It's the same psychological fucked-upness. The more conventional you are, the more you need a target, the more potent this strategy becomes. Big bureaucracies, aggressive arseholes who need to be "the cleverest" – they're ripe for the picking. Their aggression, their need to dominate, becomes their Achilles' heel when there's nothing to swing at. It’s like throwing punches into the fog. Exhausting, demoralising, and utterly useless. Even Josephine, that wily Empress, used it on Napoleon. Enticed him, never quite gave him what he wanted, and he became her slave. Some things never change, even if the stakes are different.
Your Enemies' Resources, Your Fuel
Forget traditional logistics. The guerrilla lives off the land, and even better, off the enemy. Mao took weapons and food from the Nationalist Chinese. Jay Gould, that financial rogue, infiltrated Vanderbilt’s own operations and used the old bastard’s money to fund his chaos. Your opponent’s strength, their systems, their very presence – it all becomes a supply line for your campaign of disruption. Keep it lean, keep it fluid.
Time: Your Ally, Their Nightmare
While conventional armies dread the drag, you embrace it. Time is your attack dog. Every ticking second is a barbed wire fence, a dwindling supply, a drop in morale for your enemy. Let them stumble, let them make mistakes. Let them think just one more push, one more battle, will do the trick. You want them to rot slowly, not break fast. A clear trap, and they'll bolt. But a slow, insidious corrosion? That'll do more damage than any frontal assault.
And don't be afraid to pull the rug out from under them in the theatre of public opinion. Make it a people's war, a righteous cause. The longer it goes on, the more morally bankrupt they look, the more politically isolated they become.
The Endgame: Exhaustion or Extermination
You win one of two ways. You can bleed them so dry that the knockout punch, when it comes, is delivered to a corpse. Or, and this is the classier move, you just wait. You make it so unbearable, so pointless, that they simply give up. They fall on their own sword, and you haven't wasted a single bullet. That's the real artistry of it.
But even a ghost campaign can't last forever. If the rot isn't setting in fast enough, if the end isn't nigh, then you hit them. Like the North Vietnamese with the Tet Offensive. A sudden, sharp acceleration of the misery.
The name of the game is fluidity. The enemy will eventually try to adapt to your shapelessness. That's when you change again. Fight convention, just once. Strike and disperse. Your goal isn't just disorder; it’s unfamiliarity. It’s playing a game with rules only you understand.
Because ultimately, this fight isn't with their weapons, or their numbers, or their territory. It's a war for their fucking heads. And when their minds grasp at nothing but air, you've already won.
They'll exhaust themselves chasing shadows, fighting a war that isn't where they can see it. They'll bleed resources and morale in phantom battles. And while they're punching air, you're picking them apart, piece by bloody piece. It's not glorious, not by their rules. But it damn well works
Event Portfolio
Street Portfolio