The Logic of Survival
: Mastering Propositional Thinking
Right then, let’s get this sorted. You’ve put together a damn good primer on Propositional Logic – the very bedrock of clear thought and rigorous argument. It’s not just some arid corner of academia; it’s the engine room of reasoning, whether you’re building a proof, designing a circuit, or, yes, even devising strategy.
Think of it like this: every decision, every plan, every ‘if this, then that’ scenario you run through your head is a form of propositional logic at play. We, whether on the battlefield or in the lecture hall, need to be damn sure our thinking is sound. Muddled logic gets people killed, or at the very least, makes you look a complete arse.
Your notes lay out the fundamentals with admirable clarity. They cover the essential elements:
Propositions: Statements of truth or falsehood. No ‘maybes’, no ‘perhaps’. Just the stark reality of ‘is’ or ‘isn’t’. Like a situation report: Is the bridge intact? Yes or no.
Connectives: The ‘and’, ‘or’, ‘if… then’, ‘if and only if’. These are the operational links between facts. ‘The bridge is intact’ AND ‘the forward element has crossed’. Both must be true for the next phase of the plan to kick off. Fail one, and the whole thing founders.
Well-Formed Formulas: The proper structure of these connections - the grammar of logic. Get the syntax wrong, and your argument, much like a poorly briefed order, falls apart at the seams.
Truth Tables: The testing ground. Like war-gaming a scenario, a truth table allows you to see every possible outcome based on the initial propositions. Does your plan hold up under all conditions? The truth table will give you the brutal truth.
Tautologies, Contradictions, Contingencies: Understanding what is always true, always false, or dependent on circumstance. A tautology in strategy might be ‘If we are out of ammunition, we cannot fire.’ A contradiction: ‘We are advancing and retreating simultaneously.’ A contingency: ‘The success of the flanking manoeuvre depends on the fog holding.’ Knowing the difference is damn crucial.
Logical Equivalence: Recognising that different ways of saying something can have the exact same logical meaning. Useful for spotting obfuscation or for clarifying a complex situation.
Validity: The structure of an argument leading inexorably from premises to conclusion. A valid argument is like a well-executed pincer movement; if the initial conditions are met, the conclusion is unavoidable.
The applications you list – computer science, mathematics, philosophy, linguistics – are all well and good, showing the broad reach of this discipline. But its application to strategic thinking, to the analysis of intelligence, to the construction of a compelling case (be it for a new policy or a court-martial) is where its true practical power lies.
In short, propositional logic isn’t just an academic exercise. It’s a toolkit for clear thinking in a complex world. It forces you to define your terms, assess the relationships between facts, and test the robustness of your conclusions. Ignore it at your peril, for sloppy logic is the quickest route to failure.
So, study these notes. Master the connectives. Build your truth tables. Whether you’re facing a philosophical problem or a hostile force, a clear head and sound reasoning are your most potent weapons.
Event Portfolio
Street Portfolio