The White-Collar Criminal Next Door
: Unmasking the Work Ethic of the Modern Rogue
We often picture the criminal as either a shadowy figure lurking in alleys or a hardened repeat offender with a rap sheet as long as their arm. Popular culture and even much academic discourse reinforce this simplistic dichotomy. But what if the true danger lies not in the easily identifiable miscreant, but in the seemingly upright professional, the diligent employee, or even the respected pillar of the community? Dr Stanton Samenow's incisive work, particularly Chapter 5 of his seminal text, Inside the Criminal Mind, tears away these comforting illusions, exposing a disconcerting truth: for many criminals, work isn't just a means to an end; it's a meticulously crafted stage for deception, power, and illicit gain.
Samenow's central, and rather unsettling, premise is that criminals regard legitimate labour with the same cold, opportunistic detachment they apply to all aspects of their lives. For them, a job is rarely about contribution or honest earning; it's a tool, a prop, or a resource to be exploited.
He categorises the criminal's engagement with employment into three stark types:
The Rare or None: These individuals simply eschew work, viewing it as beneath them or an impediment to their preferred lifestyle. Forget the grind; they await the "big score."
The Intermittent: These are the chameleons, holding jobs sporadically, just long enough to cultivate a thin veneer of respectability. They're often quietly pilfering or scheming from day one, vanishing once boredom sets in or their illicit activities draw too much attention.
The Diligent Performer: This, perhaps, is the most unnerving category. These criminals excel in their legitimate roles, often earning promotions and trust. Their professional success is not a sign of rehabilitation, but a cunningly constructed cover for their true, nefarious pursuits.
"Work is for suckers," one career criminal bluntly told Samenow, comparing his daily shoplifting and drug dealing to an ordinary man's daily grind, but with vastly superior profit and excitement. This sentiment encapsulates the deep-seated contempt many criminals hold for conventional employment. They crave instant gratification, the thrill of the illicit, and the "easy" money, finding the slow, incremental accumulation of legitimate wealth utterly risible. The idea of "serving up fries" is an affront to their inflated self-worth.
Samenow introduces us to illuminating case studies, none more chilling than Aaron, a highly intelligent 35-year-old drug trafficker. Despite earning a tax-free £100,000 a year, his life spiralled into debt, fuelled by a compulsion to project an image of success through lavish spending. His contempt for authority was absolute; when faced with probation, he chose prison over "being miserable." Aaron didn’t see himself as an addict, but a "businessman" meeting a "demand." He even prided himself on being an "honest dealer." As Samenow notes, his only regret was getting caught. This remarkable lack of genuine remorse, even when facing the consequences of his actions, is a hallmark of the criminal personality.
Critically, Samenow dismantles the "executive illusion." Many criminals, like Daniel, an erstwhile honour student, harbour grandiose fantasies of legitimate work – a sudden ascent to power and wealth without the tedious climb. They envision themselves barking orders, never sweeping floors. When these fantasies inevitably collide with reality, and their schemes fail, the transition to 'blue-collar' crime, as Daniel did with burglary, becomes a natural, often unconscious, progression. Employment, for them, is merely a tool for self-aggrandisement or something to be avoided altogether.
Crucially, some criminals maintain steady employment for a calculated, Machiavellian reason: a "badge of respectability." This cover story deflects suspicion, allowing them to operate unscrutinised. When they do apply themselves, their talent can be genuinely impressive, leading to promotions. Yet, this recognition merely feeds their ego, solidifying their contempt for the very colleagues and superiors who reward them. They misuse authority, antagonise others, and make decisions in isolation, all with a self-serving agenda. As Samenow starkly puts it, while non-criminals may possess similar flaws, the criminal's aim is power-seeking at others' expense.
The chapter then drills down into the pervasive issue of workplace exploitation, moving beyond the stereotype of the external thief. Businesses, Samenow argues, suffer more from insider theft than external pilfering. From embezzled cash to stolen merchandise, the enemy is often within. The digital age has simply provided new vectors for this criminality, with cyberattacks enabling fraud and data theft on an unprecedented scale.
Wanda, a county agency employee who embezzled nearly a quarter of a million pounds, is a stark example. She saw her colleagues as "not the swiftest," exploiting lax oversight and masking her criminality behind an image of competence. Her husband, ironically, saw her as a paragon of financial management. When caught, her outrage was directed not at her actions, but the "assault upon her character." This narrative of blame externalisation, where accountability is perpetually evaded, is a recurring theme.
Samenow then turns his gaze to the highest echelons of corporate crime, drawing parallels between Madoff-esque fraudsters and the rogue trader Nick Leeson. These are not individuals stealing out of need, but out of the same criminal mentality of entitlement and power. Their sophisticated schemes merely reflect a 'skill' in outwitting the system, and they revel in it, caring nothing for the devastating impact on countless lives. Their respectable positions become their ultimate alibi, allowing their crimes to fester, often for years. Leeson, like many, didn't see himself as a 'criminal' but as someone who "fell into" it – another masterclass in self-deception.
Lester, a high-regarded barrister who embezzled client trust funds, encapsulates this perfectly. He had no financial need, yet stole millions. His response: he was able to "block off" the "wrongness" of his actions. This chilling capacity for compartmentalisation allows criminals to maintain a facade of integrity while simultaneously engaging in profound deceit.
Samenow’s disquieting conclusion is that these individuals possess "serious character flaws that were either hidden or ignored for years." Their talent, ironically, often eclipses their ethical failings, allowing their corrupt practices to metastasise. For the criminal, even the highest rung of success is never enough; they are perpetually driven by an insatiable hunger for more power, more control, more excitement, invariably pursuing it through illicit means. Even public servants, like the EPA official who defrauded taxpayers by feigning a secret CIA assignment, are spurred by the "excitement and the rush of getting away with something."
Perhaps the most unsettling revelation is Samenow’s return to his early research with Dr Yochelson, recalling that many criminals, paradoxically, aspired to be police officers. Their motivation was not public service, but a coveting of the "symbols of power" – the uniform, the gun, the authority to "pursue and arrest bad guys." A criminal personality embedded within law enforcement, Samenow warns, will inevitably misuse that power, leading to corruption and excessive force. Figures like Drew Peterson, the former police officer infamous for his alleged murders, serve as grotesque contemporary examples of how such individuals, despite exhibiting alarming patterns of misconduct, can repeatedly evade consequences by exploiting their knowledge of the system. His lack of remorse, even after conviction, solidified his inherent criminal mindset.
Samenow's work forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: careers, even those ostensibly marked by success and respectability, can be mere vehicles for the criminal to exercise power, to deceive, to steal, and to reinforce a distorted self-image. The modern rogue, it seems, is not always easy to spot. They may be the individual in the next office, the one earning promotions, or even the figure who commands civic trust. Their work ethic, however perverted, is often alarmingly diligent. For those of us who believe in the redemptive power of honest labour, Samenow’s findings are a potent, if depressing, reminder that for some, the very concept of a "fair day's wage for a fair day's work" is nothing short of a cosmic joke. It's a sobering perspective that demands we look beyond superficial appearances and confront the deeper maladies of the criminal mind.
Citations for this Article:
Samenow, S. E. (1984). Inside the Criminal Mind. Times Books. (This is the primary source as per the provided context).
Event Portfolio
Street Portfolio