The Futility of Reform
: Why We Fail to Rehabilitate Criminals
For decades, the earnest efforts of countless individuals and institutions have been poured into the seemingly noble endeavour of criminal rehabilitation. From vocational training to art therapy, from individual counselling to community-based programmes, the spectrum of initiatives aimed at steering offenders away from a life of crime is vast. Yet, as Dr Stanton E. Samenow meticulously argues in Chapter 14, "Rehabilitation Revisited," of his seminal work, Inside the Criminal Mind, many of these well-intentioned programmes are fundamentally flawed, built upon a shaky edifice of misunderstanding about the criminal mind itself.
The perpetual cycle of high recidivism rates and escalating carceral costs has spurred a renewed, indeed accelerating, movement for prison reform. However, Samenow cautions that without a profound re-evaluation of our underlying assumptions, we risk merely rearranging the deckchairs on a sinking ship. The historical trajectory of rehabilitation efforts has been one of fervent hope followed by crushing disillusionment, perhaps most notably epitomised by Robert Martinson's stark 1974 assertion that "nothing works." While the pendulum has swung back towards a rehabilitative ideal, Samenow contends that our approaches remain largely ineffectual because they consistently overlook one critical factor: the criminal’s internal world.
The Elephant in the Room: Character, Not Circumstance
Samenow identifies two cardinal errors that hamstring our rehabilitation efforts. Firstly, there is a profound underestimation of the sheer difficulty of character change. To imagine that deeply entrenched patterns of thought and behaviour, often forged over a lifetime, can be readily altered by a few months of therapy or a vocational course is, to put it mildly, naive. Criminality, for many, is not merely a set of actions but an integral part of their self-identity. As one felon starkly articulated, "If you take my crime away, you take my world away." This speaks volumes about the formidable resistance to change inherent in the criminal psyche, a resistance often actively — and deceptively — maintained.
Secondly, and perhaps more damningly, we suffer from a fundamental misunderstanding of the criminal mindset. The prevailing societal assumption is that criminals are essentially reasonable individuals whose needs are akin to those of law-abiding citizens, albeit unfulfilled through legitimate channels. This benevolent but misguided premise leads to the application of programmes successful with other populations, entirely oblivious to the unique cognitive distortions of the criminal. Samenow laments the squandering of "countless millions of dollars" on initiatives like yoga, gardening, or poetry composition, which, while beneficial in themselves, possess a demonstrable lack of empirical evidence in truly reshaping a criminal's core thinking.
Habilitation, Not Rehabilitation: A New Lexicon for Change
Critiquing the very semantics of "rehabilitation," Samenow shrewdly observes that the term implies a "restoring to a former capacity." For many chronic offenders, no such innocent or responsible "former capacity" ever existed. Their formative years were often characterised by a rejection of societal norms and a cultivation of self-serving, destructive behaviours. Thus, Samenow proposes "habilitation" as a more accurate and honest descriptor. This term acknowledges the necessity of helping a criminal acquire, rather than merely regain, responsible living patterns from scratch. Anything less, he warns, is akin to "pouring a delectable sauce over a slice of burned, rancid meat" – a superficial dressing of a fundamentally rotten core.
Despite these trenchant criticisms, the rehabilitative ideal, remarkably, persists. Even conservative administrations have maintained some form of programming, and juvenile justice systems explicitly articulate educational and treatment goals. Yet, the efficacy of the programmes themselves remains largely unaddressed by their mere existence.
The Illusion of Progress: Evaluating Common Strategies
Samenow proceeds to systematically dismantle the perceived effectiveness of numerous common "rehabilitation" strategies:
Academic Achievement (GEDs, College Courses): While providing structured activity and potential personal satisfaction, these initiatives often create "criminals who can read rather than criminals who are illiterate," without addressing the underlying criminal thinking. A criminal with a degree is still a criminal if their fundamental orientation to life remains unchanged.
Vocational Training: Many criminals possessed trades before their incarceration; their problem was not a lack of skills, but an unwillingness to apply them honestly. Training, therefore, risks creating "a criminal with job skills rather than a criminal without job skills," with new abilities potentially leveraged for advanced criminal enterprises rather than legitimate work.
Money Management Skills: These are largely futile without a preceding shift in mindset. Criminals often feel entitled, lack foresight, and are driven by immediate gratification. Budgeting lectures fall on deaf ears when the individual believes they are owed what they desire.
Career Counselling: While seemingly constructive, this often collides with the criminal fantasy of instant wealth and autonomy. The reality of sustained, honest work, often involving subordination, clashes with their desire for control and avoidance of effort.
Relationship and Parenting Skills: Merely teaching the language of responsible parenting is insufficient if the individual remains "a self-centered, hypersensitive, deceptive, pretentious individual who sees the world in extremes." "Talking the talk" is a performative act, not a guarantee of genuine internal shift.
Arts Programmes: While offering positive engagement and self-esteem boosts, Samenow finds "no evidence that cultivating creativity translates into eliminating criminality."
Individual and Group Therapy: Group therapy, though economical, often fails as criminals are adept at deceiving or outmanoeuvring therapists, whom they often perceive as adversaries. Their capacity for manipulation and dissimulation makes genuine therapeutic breakthroughs exceedingly rare without a fundamental willingness to confront their own deceptions.
Beyond the prison walls, community-based alternatives like probation and parole, despite technological advancements in monitoring, frequently fall short. Samenow highlights the lack of rigorous oversight in probation and the historical failings of parole, advocating for "well-thought-out, intensive programs" that specifically target criminal thinking for non-violent offenders. Even restitution or restorative justice, while valuable for victims, does not inherently alter the criminal, who may view the process as a means to self-absolve and gain "even greater license for crime."
Discrediting the Myths: "Recidivism" and "Burnout"
Samenow effectively debunks several pervasive myths that cloud our understanding of criminal behaviour. He critiques reliance on "recidivism" statistics (re-arrest, re-conviction) as an inadequate metric, given that many crimes go unreported and skilled offenders merely become "slicker," evading detection rather than abandoning perversity. The "burnout" theory, which suggests that older criminals naturally desist, is also challenged; while physical limitations may alter their methods, the core criminal personality often remains intact, merely adapting to less risky or visible forms of offending.
Perhaps his most forceful refutation is directed at the notion of "low self-esteem" as a causal factor for criminality. Samenow argues precisely the opposite: criminals often possess a "gigantic ego" and perceive themselves as "exceptional person[s] who [are] superior to others." Self-esteem building programmes, in this context, only serve to confirm this inflated self-perception, potentially enabling further harm.
Finally, while abstinence from drugs is a necessary precursor, Samenow stresses that it is not a cure for criminality. Paralleling Alcoholics Anonymous' concept of "stinking thinking," he argues that sobriety without addressing the underlying personality flaws merely results in a "dry drunk" – an individual still prone to destructive behaviour, albeit without the immediate chemical crutch.
The Path to True Habilitation: Responsibility and Moral Values
Samenow's concluding argument is both forceful and unequivocal: all these well-intentioned but ill-conceived efforts fail because they are built on a "rotten foundation" of misunderstanding. "Behaviour is a product of thinking," he asserts, and therefore, true "habilitation" must focus on transforming the offender's cognitive landscape.
Genuine change, he concedes, is arduous, requiring the criminal to become "fed up with themselves" and to actively desire a profound shift, recognising that the only alternatives are "crime, suicide, or change." He dismisses "partial participation" – the deceptive appearance of reform while secretly maintaining criminal behaviours – as unsustainable, drawing a chilling analogy with Alcoholics Anonymous: "a sip of alcohol becomes a glass, then a bottle," leading inevitably back to old patterns. Minor breaches of integrity, in the criminal world, precipitate a cascade back into depravity.
To be truly effective, Samenow insists that change programmes must:
Place total responsibility squarely on the criminal.
Focus on what the criminal does to others, rather than excusing behaviour through external circumstances.
Teach moral values that underpin a civilised society.
Equip offenders to live without injuring others.
Echoing timeless philosophical debates, Samenow concludes by asserting that "the issues I've addressed here are not new: the power to choose, free will, good versus evil, one's response to temptation, and whether one demonstrates courage or cowardice in the face of adversity." The capacity for fundamental transformation lies not in superficial remedies, but in a profound shift in interior thought processes, aligning with the ancient proverb: "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." This, and only this, is the bedrock of true "habilitation." Until we confront this uncomfortable truth, our efforts at criminal reform will remain, sadly, a testament to hopeful delusion rather than demonstrable success.
Citations for the Article
The article is a detailed summary and analysis of Chapter 14, "Rehabilitation Revisited", from "Inside the Criminal Mind" by Stanton E. Samenow, Ph.D. and does not directly contain external citations within the provided text itself, other than referencing Martinson's 1974 "Nothing Works" assessment. For a full list of sources, one would need to consult Dr. Samenow's original book.
Event Portfolio
Street Portfolio